-
November 17, 2022
Artificial Intelligence and Society: Philosophy of Fallibility
Part 13: Moderate Comprehensive Doctrine -
October 28, 2022
Artificial Intelligence and Society: Philosophy of Fallibility
Part 12: Do Selfish Individuals Implement Innovations Determined by Social Contracts? -
October 3, 2022
Artificial Intelligence and Society: Philosophy of Fallibility
Part 11: What is Innovation? -
August 19, 2022
Artificial Intelligence and Society: Philosophy of Fallibility
Part 10: Relationship between Innovation and the Social System—Abstract -
July 25, 2022
Artificial Intelligence and Society: Philosophy of Fallibility
Part 9: AI's Impact on the Relationship between Innovation and Justice—Reason Expanded by AI -
June 24, 2022
Artificial Intelligence and Society: Philosophy of Fallibility
Part 8: Thinking in Terms of Mathematical Formulas -
May 17, 2022
Artificial Intelligence and Society: Philosophy of Fallibility
Part 7: Collapse of the Grand Narrative -
April 25, 2022
Artificial Intelligence and Society: Philosophy of Fallibility
Part 6: Totalitarianism as a Pathological Manifestation of Reason -
April 1, 2022
Artificial Intelligence and Society: Philosophy of Fallibility
Part 5: Hegelian Philosophy—History as Evolution of Reason -
February 28, 2022
Artificial Intelligence and Society: Philosophy of Fallibility
Part 4: Virtue Cannot Exist Independently from Justice -
January 20, 2022
Artificial Intelligence and Society: Philosophy of Fallibility
Part 3: Challenges Faced by Liberal Political Philosophy—Rawlsian Political Philosophy -
December 10, 2021
Artificial Intelligence and Society: Philosophy of Fallibility
Part 2: Dystopian Outlook on AI -
November 9, 2021
Artificial Intelligence and Society: Philosophy of Fallibility
Part 1: A "new cognitive structure" as a rational expectations equilibrium
Artificial Intelligence and Society: Philosophy of Fallibility
How should we live our lives at present and into the near future as artificial intelligence (AI) continues to develop and spread? What is an appropriate framing for our future vision of society and what kind of public philosophy can we cultivate?
