How Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Affected Education Inequality?

KOBAYASHI Yohei
Consulting fellow, RIETI

NISHIHATA Masaya
Mitsubishi UFJ Research and Consulting Co., Ltd.

As a result of the spread of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19 pandemic), elementary, junior high and senior high schools in various regions across Japan were temporarily closed in March 2020 and thereafter. Many schools were unable to make sufficient preparations for the temporary closure, and as a result, the education of the children was largely left to families. As home learning depends significantly on the family environment, education inequality may have increased due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

This paper examines how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected inequality in child education based on an independent online questionnaire survey of 2,000 parents with children in elementary to senior high schools immediately after the state of emergency declaration was lifted nationwide (June 8 to 12, 2020) (Note 1).

Historical correlation between family circumstances and academic achievement as recorded before the COVID-19 pandemic

Before analyzing the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on inequality in child education, let us look at the correlation between the household income level, household composition and the academic achievement level before the COVID-19s pandemic. Figure 1 shows the academic achievement level of children by household income and by household composition in the school year 2019 (Note 2). The academic achievement level was lower among children from lower-income households and children from single-parent households (Note 3). The correlation between family circumstances and academic achievement level existed before the COVID-19 pandemic (Note 4).

Figure 1. Academic Achievement in 2019 by Household Income and by Household Composition
Figure 1. Academic Achievement in 2019 by Household Income and by Household Composition
Source: Kobayashi et al. (2020)

Loss of education opportunities and widening of inequality due to temporary school closures

What effects have temporary school closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic had on education opportunities for children? Figure 2 shows total learning hours per week before and after temporary school closures by academic achievement level in the previous school year (school year 2019). Regardless of the academic achievement level before the pandemic, learning hours decreased after the temporary school closures. However, the decrease was larger among children whose academic achievement level was already low, while the decrease was limited among children with high academic achievement. One possible reason for the difference is that high achievers are more effective at learning autonomously. Another is that high achievers, who tend to be from higher-income households as shown in Figure 1, may have had greater access to alternative means of learning, such as cram schools and online education during the temporary school closures (Note 5).

Figure 2. Learning Hours before and after Temporary School Closure
Figure 2. Learning Hours before and after Temporary School Closure
Source: Kobayashi et al. (2020)
Note: Respondents who replied that their children had less than 15 hours of in-school learning were excluded from the tabulation.

Prolonged temporary school closure reduces learning hours even among children with high academic achievement

Figure 3 shows changes in learning hours after the temporary school closure by the number of closure months and by academic achievement level. The green line represents the overall average hours. This shows that the higher the number of temporary school closure months, the larger the decrease in the average learning hours. By academic achievement level, the decrease in learning hours was large among children with low to medium academic achievement (purple line) even in the case of short periods of temporary school closure. On the other hand, among children with medium to high academic achievement level (yellow line), learning hours decreased little in the case of short periods of temporary school closure, but the decrease was marked when the duration of closure was long (Note 6). These findings indicate that from the viewpoint of the duration of temporary school closure, the COVID-19 pandemic tends to widen education inequality. Given the negative effects of prolonged periods of temporary school closure on learning hours among all children, including those with high academic achievement, the overall academic achievement level among children may decline if temporary school closures last long.

Figure 3. Changes after Learning Hours among Children (by Number of Temporary School Closure Months and by Academic Achievement)
Figure 3. Changes after Learning Hours among Children (by Number of Temporary School Closure Months and by Academic Achievement)
Source: Kobayashi et al. (2020)
Note: Respondents who replied that their children had less than 15 hours of in-school learning were excluded from the tabulation.

Summary of the analysis results and policy implications

The results of the analysis of the questionnaire survey used in this paper show that because of temporary school closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic, learning hours decreased markedly among children whose academic achievement level was already low compared with among children with high academic achievement. Given the strong correlation between children's family environment, including the household income level, and their academic achievement, it may be said that education inequality increased due to family environment factors. We also found that a prolonged period of temporary school closure has the effect of gradually reducing learning hours even among children with high academic achievement.

Temporary school closures implemented at this time had particularly strong negative effects on children from lower-income households and children whose academic achievement level was already low before the pandemic. As those children are statistically more likely to find it difficult to learn on their own, it is necessary to correct inequality in the learning environment, enhance individualized instructions and upgrade online learning materials so that learning gaps can be closed.

The most important thing is to promptly grasp the situation of children and continuously review the effects of support measures. In other words, it is most important to continuously iterate the process of the PDCA (Plan, Do, Check and Act) cycle of evidence-based policy making (EBPM).

October 19, 2020
Footnote(s)
  1. ^ This column is based on Kobayashi et al. (2020). For detailed analysis results, refer to that study.
  2. ^ The relative level of academic achievement of children in their grade cohort in the previous school year (school year 2019) as assessed by respondents on a five-level scale
  3. ^ In the household income bracket of 12 million yen to 15 million yen, the proportion of children in category "1 (Low)" is large, and there are two possible reasons for that. First, this anomaly may be attributable to an error due to the small number of respondents (106 people). Second, there may be a positive correlation between the household income level and the reference point, as the academic achievement level is a relative one.
  4. ^ It should be kept in mind that although the correlation may vary depending on the child's school grades, the data used in this paper represent the total for children from elementary to senior high school. Even so, as there is not much difference between the proportions of elementary school children, junior high school children, and senior high school students in the sample used in this paper and the proportions of the three groups in the School Basic Survey, our analysis is presumed to have captured the trend regarding the statistical population.
  5. ^ According to a survey by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), video was used by 26% of public elementary, junior high and senior high schools, other digital learning materials were used by 40% and interactive online instructions were provided by 15% ("Status of Teaching Instructions at Public Schools Conducted in Light of the Effects of the COVID-19 Disease"(in Japanese) by MEXT (as of June 23, 2020, https://www.mext.go.jp/content/20200717-mxt_kouhou01-000004520_1.pdf)
  6. ^ The average duration of temporary school closure was about two months according to the questionnaire survey used in this paper.
Reference(s)
  • Kobayashi Yohei, Nishihata Masaya, Yokoyama Shigehiro, Noda Suzuko, Ikeda Takaaki, and Ishikawa Takayuki (2020) "Education Inequality Widening Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic–Impact Analysis Regarding Employment, Income, and Temporary School Closures Based on An Independent Questionnaire Survey,"(in Japanese) MURC Policy Research Report
    https://www.murc.jp/report/rc/policy_rearch/politics/seiken_200821/

December 23, 2020

Article(s) by this author