This month's featured article
Industry agglomeration and location choice of productive firms: The role of product markets in adverse selection
René BELDERBOSProfessor of Strategy at KU Leuven
FUKAO KyojiFaculty Fellow, RIETI
IKEUCHI KentaSenior Fellow (Policy Economist), RIETI
KIM YoungGakProfessor, School of Economics at Senshu University
KWON Hyeog UgFaculty Fellow, RIETI
More productive firms may choose to locate in industry clusters in order to benefit from agglomeration externalities. However, negative sorting and adverse selection effects are also possible. This column studies the location decisions of Japanese multi-plant firms in order to disentangle these effects. Agglomeration effects are present when firms compete for different, or dispersed, foreign markets. On the other hand, adverse selection occurs when firms face direct rivals in the product market. It suggests there is a need for policies that provide incentives to attract highly productive firms to industrial clusters.
Recent empirical studies show that firms located in industry clusters tend to be more productive (e.g. Andersson et al. 2019, Rosenthal and Strange 2020, Lavoratori and Castellani 2021). Two competing explanations have been put forward for this correlation. The first and predominant explanation is the notion of Marshallian agglomeration externalities, which contends that firms can enjoy positive externalities stemming from geographic industry clustering. Externalities can occur on the supply side in the form of the availability of specialised factors of production and on the demand side through reduced search costs for customers and heightened local industry demand. That these possible externalities motivate firms to choose locations where similar establishments are clustered has been supported by theoretical models (e.g. Krugman 1991) and empirical work (e.g. Belderbos et al. 2021).
A second explanation is the selection effect associated with the increased competition within clusters. Collocation leads to tougher competition, forcing the exit of weaker firms with lower productivity. Moreover, more productive firms may benefit more from agglomeration, leading to a positive sorting effect, with more productive firms self-selecting into high-density clusters (Baldwin and Okubo 2006). However, this conjecture has received less substantive support in empirical research. In fact, instead of positive selection effects, negative effects are also conceivable. When productive firms locate in industry agglomerations, they run the risk that their innovative technologies and organisational and process skills could be copied by collocated rival firms. Less productive firms, in contrast, have less to lose. Such asymmetry in knowledge spillovers due to productivity differences suggests a process of negative sorting (adverse selection) in which firms with relatively weaker (rather than stronger) productivity are more likely to locate within industry clusters.
To read the full text:
“Inter-firm transaction networks and location in a city: Evidence from Japan”
OTAZAWA Toshimori (Kobe University) / OHIRA Yuki (Tottori University) / Jos VAN OMMEREN (VU Amsterdam & Tinbergen Institute)
“Does Industry Agglomeration Attract Productive Firms? The role of product markets in adverse selection”
René BELDERBOS (KU Leuven / UNU-MERIT / Maastricht University) / FUKAO Kyoji (Faculty Fellow, RIETI) / IKEUCHI Kenta (Senior Fellow (Policy Economist), RIETI) / KIM Young Gak (Senshu University) / KWON Hyeog Ug (Faculty Fellow, RIETI)
“Agglomeration of Low-productive Entrepreneurs to Large Regions: A Simple Model”
Rikard FORSLID (Stockholm University) / OKUBO Toshihiro (Keio University)
Our latest discussion papers
“Road Traffic Flow and Air Pollution Concentrations: Evidence from Japan”
NISHITATENO Shuhei (Research Associate, RIETI) / Paul J. BURKE (Australian National University) / ARIMURA Toshi H. (Faculty Fellow, RIETI)
“How are Organizational Architectures of Corporate Social Responsibility Related to Corporate Performance? The case of Japanese listed companies”
AMBASHI Masahito (Consulting Fellow, RIETI)
“Does Official Development Assistance Benefit the Donor Economy? New evidence from Japanese overseas infrastructure projects”
NISHITATENO Shuhei (Research Associate, RIETI)
“Dollar Dominance in Cross-border Bank Loans and Its Response to Uncertainties”
ITO Hiroyuki (Visiting Fellow, RIETI) / XU Ying (Australian National University)
“University as a Knowledge Source of Innovation: A spatial analysis of the impact on local high-tech startup creation”
MOTOHASHI Kazuyuki (Faculty Fellow, RIETI) / ZHAO Qiuhan (University of Tokyo)
[List of discussion papers]
[List of upcoming and past symposiums]
[List of upcoming and past BBL seminars]
* To subscribe, please go to SHANON's website.
Fellow titles and links in the text are as of the date of publication.
For questions or comments regarding RIETI Report, please contact the editor.*If the "Send by mailer" button does not work, please copy the address into your email "send to" field and connect the prefix and the suffix of the address with an "@", sending it normally.
RIETI Report is published bi-weekly.