China in Transition

Impact of the Collapse in Stock Prices on the Chinese Economy

Chi Hung KWAN
Consulting Fellow, RIETI

There are mounting concerns in China that the economy will weaken further, with consumption and investment falling, reflecting the collapse of stock prices since mid-June 2015. However, if funds leaving the stock market flow into the housing market, which has already shown signs of recovery, a further slowdown in the economy can probably be avoided.

The impact of the collapse in stock prices on consumption and investment is limited

Even though stock prices have collapsed in China, as of July 2015, the Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index is still 80% higher than its level a year ago. This suggests that there are still far more winners than losers among investors in the stock market. Accordingly, even after the sharp fall in stock prices, the asset effect of changes in stock prices on consumption has remained positive although its margin has shrunk (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Changes in the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) Composite Index (year on year)
Figure 1: Changes in the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) Composite Index (year on year)
Note: Monthly average. For July 2015, however, it is the average for the days until the 27th of the month.
Source: Compiled by the author based on the CEIC Database (raw data from the Shanghai Stock Exchange).

There is also concern that the suspension of the initial public offering (IPO) implemented as part of the measures to support stock prices will reduce investments. However, given that the financing of companies with stocks accounts for only 3.1% of total social financing (based on the balance at the end of 2014), the impact should be limited (Figure 2). Borrowings from banks are still the largest source of funding for companies (accounting for 66.3% of total social financing), and financing costs have declined somewhat due to a series of rate cuts.

Figure 2: Total Social Financing (based on the balance at the end of 2014)
Figure 2: Total Social Financing (based on the balance at the end of 2014)
Source: Compiled by the author based on the CEIC Database.

Spillovers on the housing market worth noting

Meanwhile, in contrast to other countries, there is a negative--rather than positive--correlation between stock prices and housing prices in China (Figure 3). This may reflect the large-scale movement of funds between these two markets in an environment where alternative investment opportunities are limited.

Figure 3: SSE Composite Index and Price Indices of Residential Buildings
Figure 3: SSE Composite Index and Price Indices of Residential Buildings
Note: The July 2015 figure for SSE Composite index is the daily average between July 1 and July 27. First-tier cities in the price indices of residential buildings are Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen.
Source: Compiled by the author based on Bloomberg data and the CEIC Database.

In fact, from 2013 to 2014, as housing prices rose sharply, stock prices were depressed, while in the second half of 2014, when housing prices entered a correction phase, stock prices began rising sharply. Around the middle of 2015, as housing prices moved upward again, stock prices collapsed.

When thinking about the impact on the macro economy, changes in housing prices are more important than fluctuations in stock prices. Whether or not the negative correlation between housing prices and stock prices will continue is of particular importance.

Since the second half of 2014, the Chinese economy has been slowing, and the real gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate fell from 7.4% on a year-on-year basis in the first half of 2014 to 7.0% in the first half of 2015 despite rising stock prices, due largely to the downturn in the housing market. In 2014, real estate-related investments (in nominal terms) amounted to 9.5 trillion yuan, or 14.9% of GDP (of which housing-related investments was 6.4 trillion yen, or 10.1% of GDP). With stagnant housing prices as a backdrop, year-on-year growth in investment in real estate development declined from 14.1% in the first half of 2014 to 4.6% in the first half of 2015. This alone should have dragged down the GDP growth rate by about 1.4 percentage points (14.9% × [14.1% - 4.6%] = 1.42%).

Given the previous trend for housing prices to start to move six months to a year after the floor space of residential buildings sold (both measured on a year-on-year basis), we could argue that the latter is an effective leading indicator of the former (Figure 4). In fact, year-on-year growth in the floor space of residential buildings sold has already turned positive since April 2015, suggesting that housing prices will head toward recovery before long. If funds flow from the stock market to the housing market, it is expected that housing prices and, in turn, investment in real estate development will also pick up. In that case, China will maintain an economic growth rate of around 7.0% in the latter half of 2015 as well as in 2016.

Figure 4: Floor Space of Residential Buildings Sold as a Leading Indicator of Housing Sales Price
Figure 4: Floor Space of Residential Buildings Sold as a Leading Indicator of Housing Sales Price
Note: Sales prices are the simple average of 70 large and medium-sized cities, using the Sales Price Indices of Newly Constructed Residential Buildings up to December 2010 and Sales Price Indices of Newly Constructed Commercial Residential Buildings from January 2011. Floor space sold is that of newly constructed commercial residential buildings. As these data are published in aggregate for January and February, the chart shows the same figure for both months.
Source: Compiled by the author based on the CEIC Database (Original data from the National Bureau of Statistics of China).

The original text in Japanese was posted on August 4, 2015.

Related article

August 19, 2015