Author Name | NAIKI Yoshiko (Osaka University) |
---|---|
Creation Date/NO. | August 2013 13-P-014 |
Research Project | Comprehensive Research on the Current International Trade System |
Download / Links |
Abstract
While the Word Trade Organization's (WTO) Technical Barriers to Trade (hereinafter "TBT Agreement") has long remained unused as a legal basis of the WTO dispute settlement, the Appellate Body made three landmark decisions in 2012: US-Clove Cigarettes, US-Tuna II, and US-COOL. This paper addresses the second case, US-Tuna II. This decision is of importance not only because it clarified two key obligations of the TBT Agreement (i.e., Articles 2.1 and 2.2), but also it resolved and refined other important issues under the Agreement, such as the treatment of process and production methods, the definition of a "technical regulation," and the definition of an "international standard." This paper examines each important finding in this case and considers the implications and insights that this decision provides for future TBT disputes.